AI just joined your interview panel.
Somewhere in the world right now, a hiring manager is asking a question… and three seconds later ChatGPT is answering it.
In 2020, I was 11 weeks pregnant as the world began to shut down. 6ish months later I went on maternity leave, and when I returned 10 months after that (if you’re struggling with the maths, we’re now in July 2021), the recruitment world had CHANGED.
For 10 years prior I’d had it drilled into me that if you couldn’t pick someone out of a lineup, you didn’t submit them for a job. Video interviews were a last resort, typically only if someone lived overseas, otherwise, it rarely happened - and now I arrived back in a market where if you couldn’t submit your candidate 24 hours after seeing their CV for the first time, they’d get a job before you’d even thought about formatting their resume. In addition to that, people WERE more conscious of germs, so obligating people to come into the city, on a train, or bus, to interview with you for 30 minutes was a thing of the past.
I’ll be honest, it took me a while to adjust, and I didn’t like it.
One of the best things about my job was getting to meet new people all the time, and building a rapport and understanding of who they were and what they were like, that is unmatchable in experience by meeting face to face. I’ve LITERALLY made now lifelong friends (and boyfriends! Don’t judge, I was very professional) by interviewing candidates in person, and realising they were my kind of people.
However, life is change, I adapted, and 5 years on, the recruitment market is about to flip again.
In just the last week, I’ve had two hiring managers tell me they have been in a video interview, and it was obvious the candidate they were speaking with was reading answers provided by AI. Remember when Googling answers during an interview felt risky? That was adorable.
In each case they told the candidate they were speaking with that they wanted to hear what THEY thought, and what THEY had to say, not AI, and they carried on with the interview. In each instance I don’t believe the candidate got the job, but honestly, I thought both hiring managers were very gracious about the circumstance. What kind of awful position do people want to get themselves into where they secure a job because of knowledge they don’t possess and skills they don’t have? Of course, that’s a harsh perspective - maybe these candidates get nervous in interviews, and struggle to articulate what they DO know, but either way, it makes me nervous for them, and the organisation who might hire them.
Now we move to point number 2- recruiters are being told they are going to be replaced by AI, but hilariously, (or ironically? I don’t know, I always struggle to know what’s truly ironic), I believe we’re going to come full circle. I think the recruitment process of the future is going to involve compulsory face to face interviews (and I guess people who are short sighted will have to remove their glasses in case they are AI enabled?!), where AI cannot impede the interviewers ability to get an accurate read on capability, cultural fit and competence. In a world where writing an AI CV takes as long as it does for me to sneeze 3 times, how will organisations ensure they’re getting what they’re paying for?
To add to this, external recruiters (like the glorious people who work at PRA) are going to have to jack up (or brush up, depending on their baseline) on their depth of technical knowledge to be able to dive into what the resume presented to them says, and translate this into what it means in the real world, and know how to probe and dig to ensure what’s in front of them matches what’s in front of them. Wait- that’s confusing (isn’t all of this?!).
With little fanfare or announcement, the modern interview panel now includes a recruiter, a hiring manager, and an invisible robot whispering in the candidate’s ear. Really this is the story of a new interview skill: maintaining eye contact while secretly reading bullet points generated 0.8 seconds ago.
Nothing is stopping this from happening (yet), but watch out, it won’t last long.
Do you know the best thing about this article? I wrote it on an aeroplane without wifi, to make sure I didn’t cheat and use AI! It’s tempting, I get it! But I’ve got something AI doesn’t.…a memory of what this job felt like before speed became the primary KPI.
I’ve sat across the table from people who were brilliant on paper and wrong in person. I’ve also met people who were terrible at interviews and incredible at the job. That messy, human gap between what’s written and what’s real is where recruitment actually lives. AI can help people sound smarter, faster, sharper. But it can’t replace instinct, curiosity, or the ability to sense when someone lights up talking about the thing they love.
So yes, the tools will change. The process will evolve. The pace will keep accelerating. But the end goal stays stubbornly, inconveniently human. And maybe the future of hiring isn’t about competing with AI at all, it’s about doubling down on the parts of this work that technology still can’t fake.
Connection. Judgement. Trust.
Turns out, those were always the real job.
Written by, Carrah Jordan
PRA CEO









